1)
Questions and Answers :
Web site :
Dear administrators, please fix the "create a team" function on your website
(Message 8525)
Posted 1 Nov 2023 by Aurum Post: I think this only works if you created a universal team years ago. They abandoned that long ago so now new teams each have a different Team ID for each project. If one had a way to discover their Team ID for Moowrap or LHC they could display their team link. But I suspect that projects like LHC and Moowrap abandoned team creation when universal team creation was abandoned by BOINC. It would be nice if they'd implement team creation but I doubt they ever will. |
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Massive Failures
(Message 8223)
Posted 16 Jul 2020 by Aurum Post: It's clear that CPU WUs are a disaster. I disabled CPU work and returned all the ones I have. |
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Massive Failures
(Message 8222)
Posted 16 Jul 2020 by Aurum Post: In the last 20 minutes the failures have already increased to 46%. There are 19 Invalids but every time I click on Invalid on the Tasks page I get Service Unavailable. |
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Massive Failures
(Message 8221)
Posted 16 Jul 2020 by Aurum Post: Is it the status quo for this project to produce a huge number (43% of WUs) of "errors while computing???" <core_client_version>7.9.3</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process exited with code 195 (0xc3, -61)</message> <stderr_txt> 05:33:36 (31482): wrapper: starting v1.3.9.7 05:33:36 (31482): device: 28 x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2683 v3 @ 2.00GHz [Family 6 Model 63 Stepping 2] (3.100020 GFLOPS) 05:33:36 (31482): checkpoint interval: 70 min (task 12600 GFLOPS, 68 min) 05:33:36 (31482): wrapper: running dnetc517-linux-x86-elf-uclibc (-ini dnetc.ini -runoffline -multiok=1) - attempt 1/10 dnetc v2.9108-517-CFR-10032922 for Linux (Linux 5.3.0-62-generic). Using email address (distributed.net ID) '<censored> ' [Jul 16 12:33:36 UTC] Open failed for './in.r72' Unable to obtain directory information. [Jul 16 12:33:36 UTC] Buffer seek/read error. Partial packet discarded. [Jul 16 12:33:36 UTC] Shutdown - packet limit exceeded. [Jul 16 12:33:36 UTC] Open failed for './in.r72' Unable to obtain directory information. [Jul 16 12:33:36 UTC] Open failed for './in.r72' Unable to obtain directory information. [Jul 16 12:33:36 UTC] *Break* Shutting down... [Jul 16 12:33:36 UTC] Shutdown complete. 05:33:37 (31482): app exit status: 0xfe 05:33:37 (31482): called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> |
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
CPU WU earn enough to bother???
(Message 8109)
Posted 8 Apr 2019 by Aurum Post: Relative to GPU WUs and other CPU projects do the CPU earn enough to bother running them??? |
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
This is just weird, help needed!
(Message 8107)
Posted 26 Mar 2019 by Aurum Post: Yes Moowrapper is very weird. I've been searching for a description of the strange behavior of this project and can find nothing. There should be a pinned link explaining what to expect. E.g., two computers both with a pair of 1080 Ti's and one gets "0.2 CPUs + 2 NVIDIA GPUs (devices 0, 1)" and the other gets "0.25 CPUs + 1 NVIDIA GPU (device 0)" for no apparent reason. The GPU Utilization is so low I'd normally run two WUs per GPU but this project is so odd I have no idea what I should do. Also the MW Preferences have so many options that all use "pipe" but when I search this website for pipe I get nothing. And it sometimes just throws off 100% Cumputation Erros that seems to be mitigated if I reboot the computer. |