Posts by [AF>FAH-Addict.net]toTOW
|
21)
Message boards :
Wish list :
Priority management in Windows
(Message 1165)
Posted 9 Oct 2011 by [AF>FAH-Addict.net]toTOW Post: The impact is much more important on my two 9800 GTX+. A WU takes twice the time if I don't set the priority manually. On the ATI, the impact on performance is almost unseen ... (and as mentionned in previous post, the difference in GPU usage is lesser than on the NV cards). |
|
22)
Message boards :
Wish list :
Priority management in Windows
(Message 1164)
Posted 9 Oct 2011 by [AF>FAH-Addict.net]toTOW Post: Sorry for the delay in answer, I forgot about this post ... Anyway, I just checked how I set my GPU clients : it was set to 2 for my ATI client, but it was to be run with FAH clients. Now, with the current settings of the Moo client and the Constellation application (on CPUs), I only get ~65% GPU usage of my two 9800 GTX+ and 90% on the 5770. Bumping manually the priority of the Moo client from idle to normal in Windows Task Manager allow me to use 100% of the GPUs. I hope it'll help you tweak you client to solve the issue. |
|
23)
Message boards :
Wish list :
Priority management in Windows
(Message 984)
Posted 4 Sep 2011 by [AF>FAH-Addict.net]toTOW Post: As you may know, in GPGPU application, you need to keep a small amount of CPU free to ba able to feed the GPU with data to process and to retrieve the results from the GPU. I've noticed that some CPU application in BOINC (Constellation@home for instance) tend to run at the same or higher priority than the dnetc client that Moo uses, resulting in a a GPU not being used at 100% and slow performance. I remember when I first tried the dnetc official GPU client that I had to change the priority in the preferences. Is it possible to apply this modification to the dnetc client that Moo uses ? P.S : I'll give you the values I used for my dnetc official client this evening when I'll be in front of my GPU machines. |
|
24)
Message boards :
News :
CPU applications deployed and CUDA memory requirements changed
(Message 515)
Posted 28 May 2011 by [AF>FAH-Addict.net]toTOW Post: I'm not sure we'll support OGR-27, since yoyo@home ( http://www.rechenkraft.net/yoyo/) is actually doing it. Your first argument is not valid since there are two wrappers for RC5 ;) And since Moo! Wrapper is the only one allowing us to use our distributed.net account, I'd rather use it for OGR too instead of joining yoyo ... |
|
25)
Message boards :
News :
CPU applications deployed and CUDA memory requirements changed
(Message 488)
Posted 26 May 2011 by [AF>FAH-Addict.net]toTOW Post: Since you now have a CPU client, do you plan to add OGR support to Moo! Wrapper ? |
|
26)
Questions and Answers :
Windows :
High CPU usage
(Message 101)
Posted 4 May 2011 by [AF>FAH-Addict.net]toTOW Post: I'm seeing 0% CPU usage here (real one, not the wrong setting in the boinc client which should be drastically reduced), both with the official distributed.net client and the wrapper ... (5770 on XP with 11.3 drivers) What is your setup ? |
|
27)
Questions and Answers :
Preferences :
Problem with Distributed.net ID preference
(Message 100)
Posted 4 May 2011 by [AF>FAH-Addict.net]toTOW Post: I like the possibility to link my BOINC account to the distributed.net one. Thank you :) It was missing in the DNETC@home wrapper :( |
Previous 20
Copyright © 2011-2024 Moo! Wrapper Project