Posts by [AF>EDLS] Polynesia
|
1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
boinc 7.0.2
(Message 1628)
Posted 6 Dec 2011 by  [AF>EDLS] Polynesia
Post: I have mistakes in this version: 06/12/2011 11:44:38 | Moo! Wrapper | [error] Can't parse application version in scheduler reply: unexpected XML tag or syntax 06/12/2011 11:44:38 | Moo! Wrapper | [error] No close tag in scheduler reply |
|
2)
Message boards :
News :
Application version 1.2 deployed
(Message 555)
Posted 31 May 2011 by [AF>EDLS] Polynesia
Post: ok |
|
3)
Message boards :
News :
Different workunit sizes added
(Message 481)
Posted 26 May 2011 by [AF>EDLS] Polynesia
Post: 24/05/2011 20:57:57 | | NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce GTX 470 (driver version 27527, CUDA version 4000, compute capability 2.0, 1217MB, 1176 GFLOPS peak) a unit end 192 is it a normal unit? |
|
4)
Message boards :
News :
Different workunit sizes added
(Message 467)
Posted 24 May 2011 by [AF>EDLS] Polynesia
Post: My card is 1176 Gflops from boinc manager, I think ... So should I get by the big units? 24/05/2011 20:57:57 | | NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce GTX 470 (driver version 27527, CUDA version 4000, compute capability 2.0, 1217MB, 1176 GFLOPS peak) |
|
5)
Message boards :
News :
Different workunit sizes added
(Message 435)
Posted 23 May 2011 by [AF>EDLS] Polynesia
Post: It was so one day I want to calculate a larger unit than an hour as before .... |
|
6)
Message boards :
Cafe :
The 1st Cafe Thread, Welcome to All
(Message 432)
Posted 22 May 2011 by [AF>EDLS] Polynesia
Post: Hello to all friends Terran ... |
|
7)
Message boards :
News :
Different workunit sizes added
(Message 431)
Posted 22 May 2011 by [AF>EDLS] Polynesia
Post: It is not possible to select the unit size? |
|
8)
Message boards :
News :
Switched to granting static credit
(Message 405)
Posted 20 May 2011 by [AF>EDLS] Polynesia
Post: I tried 2 units dnetc and I noticed they had slightly increased appropriations for Nvidia: 816 pts for less than 15 minutes instead of 700 before their worries ... What makes when an hour with about 3200 points, they are almost at your height in the funds .... |
|
9)
Message boards :
News :
Application version 1.2 deployed
(Message 394)
Posted 19 May 2011 by [AF>EDLS] Polynesia
Post: hello, This version is not same as the project dnetc @ Home? For 15 minutes at home and almost 1 hour to Moo! |
|
10)
Message boards :
Status info :
Latest ATI/nVidia requirements
(Message 333)
Posted 16 May 2011 by [AF>EDLS] Polynesia
Post: Most of the people are not already in 6.10.58 or 60? I am 6.12.26 ... |
|
11)
Message boards :
News :
Switched to granting static credit
(Message 309)
Posted 14 May 2011 by [AF>EDLS] Polynesia
Post: You are not to be pitied because owners are more than ATIs GPU taf and therefore more credit than those with Nvidia ... |
|
12)
Message boards :
News :
Switched to granting static credit
(Message 269)
Posted 12 May 2011 by [AF>EDLS] Polynesia
Post: It's gonna hurt .... I spend around 7000 to 2200 around ... Edit : still a fair bit when we see that the PPS project sieve yoyo@home I 4533 for 15 minutes while computing is the calculation takes almost 4000 seconds around my house .... I understand for ATI cards that calculate dry in about 1000 a unit but for cards that calculate dry in around 4000 ... For fairness I understand both those for ATIs that are credited less .... |
|
13)
Questions and Answers :
Preferences :
benchmarks
(Message 239)
Posted 11 May 2011 by [AF>EDLS] Polynesia
Post: So much for me : (what is the 64. 128 and 256, and the last two cores?) dnetc v2.9109-518-GTR-10092921 for CUDA 3.1 on Win32 (WindowsNT 6.1). Please provide the *entire* version descriptor when submitting bug reports. The distributed.net bug report pages are at http://bugs.distributed.net/ [May 11 22:35:07 UTC] nvcuda.dll Version: 8.17.12.7061 [May 11 22:35:07 UTC] RC5-72: using core #0 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd). [May 11 22:35:18 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #0 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd) 0.00:00:08.34 [520,611,087 keys/sec] [May 11 22:35:18 UTC] RC5-72: using core #1 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd). [May 11 22:35:36 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #1 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd) 0.00:00:15.47 [286,025,348 keys/sec] [May 11 22:35:36 UTC] RC5-72: using core #2 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd). [May 11 22:35:54 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #2 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd) 0.00:00:15.64 [282,044,236 keys/sec] [May 11 22:35:54 UTC] RC5-72: using core #3 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd). [May 11 22:36:12 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #3 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd) 0.00:00:15.42 [285,615,619 keys/sec] [May 11 22:36:12 UTC] RC5-72: using core #4 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd). [May 11 22:36:29 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #4 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd) 0.00:00:15.41 [286,203,344 keys/sec] [May 11 22:37:06 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #6 (CUDA 4-pipe 64-thd) 0.00:00:15.69 [277,522,484 keys/sec] [May 11 22:37:06 UTC] RC5-72: using core #7 (CUDA 4-pipe 128-thd). [May 11 22:37:22 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #7 (CUDA 4-pipe 128-thd) 0.00:00:13.47 [327,522,461 keys/sec] [May 11 22:37:22 UTC] RC5-72: using core #8 (CUDA 4-pipe 256-thd). [May 11 22:37:41 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #8 (CUDA 4-pipe 256-thd) 0.00:00:15.36 [298,577,264 keys/sec] [May 11 22:37:41 UTC] RC5-72: using core #9 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd busy wait). [May 11 22:37:51 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #9 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd bus ... 0.00:00:08.31 [521,166,124 keys/sec] [May 11 22:37:51 UTC] RC5-72: using core #10 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep 100us). [May 11 22:38:09 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #10 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sl ... 0.00:00:15.45 [279,218,148 keys/sec] [May 11 22:38:09 UTC] RC5-72: using core #11 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep dyna ... [May 11 22:38:20 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #11 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sl ... 0.00:00:08.31 [523,504,575 keys/sec] [May 11 22:38:20 UTC] RC5-72 benchmark summary : Default core : #0 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd) Fastest core : #11 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep dynamic) [May 11 22:38:20 UTC] Core #11 is marginally faster than the default core. Testing variability might lead to pick one or the other. |
|
14)
Questions and Answers :
Preferences :
benchmarks
(Message 237)
Posted 11 May 2011 by [AF>EDLS] Polynesia
Post: It's "dnetc518-win32-x86-cuda31.exe" for you. how I run this benchmark, I did not understand |
|
15)
Questions and Answers :
Preferences :
benchmarks
(Message 232)
Posted 11 May 2011 by [AF>EDLS] Polynesia
Post: How this benchmark? because I is not this file: dnetc518-win32-x86-stream.exe |
|
16)
Message boards :
Wish list :
platforms supported
(Message 177)
Posted 9 May 2011 by [AF>EDLS] Polynesia
Post: [Quote] hi, we are proud to support all GPUs. Any ATI and nVidia cards are supported on windows and Linux (32 or 64 bits). Is there any platform that you wanted to be supported? [/ Quote] I think that an application for Mac would be welcome in 32b and 64 b. ... Thank you |
|
17)
Questions and Answers :
Windows :
CUDA Failure
(Message 136)
Posted 6 May 2011 by [AF>EDLS] Polynesia
Post: I did not feel that changing the line: <command_line>-ini-Dnetc.ini runoffline-multiok=1</command_line> by <command_line>-ini dnetc.ini -runoffline -multiok=1 -c 10</command_line> réduice CUDA time units because the last two times were 8000 sec each Envrionment ... unless these units is very long compared to the previous .... |
|
18)
Message boards :
Wish list :
reduce duration cuda
(Message 130)
Posted 6 May 2011 by [AF>EDLS] Polynesia
Post: ok thanks |
|
19)
Message boards :
Wish list :
reduce duration cuda
(Message 127)
Posted 6 May 2011 by [AF>EDLS] Polynesia
Post: I tried and I got this message: 05/06/2011 2:18:15 p.m. | Moo! Wrapper | [error] File-job-cuda31 1.00.xml has wrong size: expected 229, Got 235 <job_desc> <task> <application>dnetc518-win32-x86-cuda31.exe</application> <checkpoint_filename>chkpoint</checkpoint_filename> <command_line>-ini dnetc.ini -runoffline -multiok=1 -c 10</command_line> </task> </job_desc> |
|
20)
Message boards :
Wish list :
reduce duration cuda
(Message 117)
Posted 5 May 2011 by [AF>EDLS] Polynesia
Post: If you could reduce the duration units cuda, it would be nice .... for 30 minutes or more one hour it's still long even if it's true that it is credited .... |
Next 20
Copyright © 2011-2024 Moo! Wrapper Project